Are Cell Phones Safe? CDC Changes Its Mind

INDIANAPOLIS – The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) became the first federal agency to acknowledge health risks from cell-phone use and then suddenly backtracked. Sometime before early June, the CDC posted significant new wording in a “Frequently Asked Questions” section on its website.

To the question, “Do cell phones cause health problems in children?” it read, “It’s too soon to know for sure,” and went on to say children will have more exposure over a lifetime growing up with cell phones. Last week however that statement was changed to simply, “It’s not known if cell-phone use by children can cause health problems.”

Jim Turner, board chair of Citizens for Health and a public interest lawyer, speculates the changes were triggered either by industry lobbyists, government officials, or both.

“CDC wasn’t sitting over there and put the thing up the first time, and then said, ‘Oh, wait a minute, let’s take it down.’ Somebody alerted them they wanted it down or there was going to be trouble,” Turner says.

The agency made other backtracking language changes regarding possible cancer and other health risks from cell phones.

Louis Slesin, editor and publisher of Microwave News, says the softening of the CDC’s language is puzzling because, as he puts it, they’ve got “bigger fish to fry.”

“Ebola in Africa and all the things that are going on, it’s really quite remarkable that someone made the effort to change something that was really very, very minor,” says Slesin. “All it was saying was, ‘We think there’s something to this. Don’t discount it.’ That’s all they were really saying.”

The CDC website also originally said, “We recommended caution in cell phone usage,” but has removed the word “we.” Turner says even the softened statement is an eye-opener.

“I will tell you right now for the CDC to say that ‘some organizations recommend caution in cell phone use’ is, in and of itself, a very, very significant statement,” Turner says.

Slesin says he can’t understand, and the CDC won’t tell him, why it has backed away from acknowledging several international studies that suggest health risks from cell phones.

“This is just telling people, ‘We see the data. There are some issues here that need to be worked out. Be cautious until it is,'” Slesin says. “The fact they backed away from that is really quite extraordinary.”

The agency also says in the FAQs “more research is needed.” Turner says that statement alone should spur the nation’s nearly 328 million cell phone users to learn more about the potential hazards and what they might do to lessen them.

The CDC has not returned a request for comment.

Mary Kuhlman